Big Match Breakdown: Brazil v Switzerland

Midfield quality will come from Philippe Coutinho, Paulinho and Casemiro. Manchester City’s F ernandinho is an option too.

Thiago Silva is Brazil’s defensive lynchpin, with Liverpool target Alisson poised to get the nod over Man City’s Ederson in goal.

As for Switzerland, Haris Seferovic should be given the nod up front, although Josip Drmic is an option.

But it’s Stoke City’s Xherdan Shaqiri who is their key asset. The 26-year-old has World Cup pedigree – he scored a hat-trick in 2014 – and is likely to be his side’s main source of creativity in an attacking trio behind the striker.

Granit Xhaka appears to have shaken off injury, and if deemed fit enough, is a likely starter in the holding role alongside Valon Behrami.

Key Battles

Both teams are in excellent form, but can Switzerland really manage to contain Neymar, Willian, Jesus, Roberto Firmino and Coutinho?

It’s a big, big ask. They’ll need to watch out for Marcelo down the left flank too.

Switzerland will need Xhaka to pick out passes with pin-point accuracy, and Shaqiri needs to be at his creative best. Without that, they’ll struggle.

If Brazil get on top and flood the Swiss defence, this could turn very one-sided.

Match Odds

There are no surprises here. The Coral traders make Brazil 2/5 favourites, with Switzerland the 15/2 underdogs. A draw can be backed at 17/5 while it’s 19/10 on the Switzerland/Draw double chance.

Conversely, there’s 6/5 for Brazil to win and over 2.5 goals, and 11/4 for a samba success and over 3.5 strikes.

Neymar is Brazil’s talisman, and the PSG ace is 5/2 favourite to score first. There’s 14/5 about Jesus bagging the opener, with Firmino 16/5.

For Switzerland, Drmic is 9/1 to put them 1-0 up, with Mario Gavranovic and Seferovic 10/1, and Shaqiri 11/1. Arsenal fans might have one eye on Xhaka and his occasionally successful eft-peg. The midfielder is 40/1 to score first and 12/1 anytime.

Big match previews, betting tips and transfer news – we’ve got it all.

All Odds and Markets are correct as of the date of publishing