Crystal Palace v Rayo Vallecano

LiveWednesday, 27-May-26. 19:00Change Match
1st Half | 40:41
Crystal Palace
0
0
Rayo
J. Mateta
Shot Off Target
Possession
42%
58%
Dangerous Attacks
22
11
Shots on Target
0
0
0
0
Corners
1
1
2
0
In-play score information is for guidance only and can be subject to delay. Coral accepts no liability should the displayed information be listed incorrectly.
Hide Stats
In-Play Odds Booster
C.Palace v R.Vallecano
Alvaro Garcia To Score Anytime (90 mins)
Was7/1
In-Play Odds Booster
C.Palace v R.Vallecano
First Goalscorer - Mateta (90 mins)
Was5/1
In-Play Odds Booster
C.Palace v R.Vallecano
Sarr To Score Anytime (90 mins)
Was7/2
Match Result
SHOW STATS
Crystal Palace
Draw
Rayo Vallecano
90 Mins
1st Half
2nd Half
In-Play Odds Boosters (90 Mins Only)
First Goalscorer - Mateta (Was 5/1)
First Goalscorer - Alemao (Was 10/1)
1st Goal Method A Header (Was 5/1)
Crystal Palace To Win 2-0 Or 3-0 (Was 9/2)
Sending Off In Match (Was 3/1)
Penalty Scored In Match (Was 3/1)
First Team to Score
Crystal Palace
Rayo Vallecano
No Score
Match Odds and Both Teams to Score
Player Total Shots On Target
Player To Be Carded
Popular Goalscorer Markets
Half time/ Full Time Result Market
Match Result and Total Goals 2.5
Match Result and Total Goals 4.5
Draw No Bet
Over/Under Goals Crystal Palace
Handicap Results
Team To Have The Most Corners
Over/Under Total Corners Crystal Palace
Team to Have the Most Total Cards
Over/Under Total Cards Crystal Palace
Half-Time In-Play Odds Boosters (90 Mins Only)
Alemao To Score In 2nd Half (Was 11/2)
Mateta To Score In 2nd Half (Was 11/4)
To Lift the Trophy
Crystal Palace
Rayo Vallecano
Both Teams to Score
Over/Under Total Goals
Player Total Shots
Correct Score
To Score a Hat-trick?
Match Result and Total Goals 1.5
Match Result and Total Goals 3.5
Match Result and Total Goals 5.5
Double Chance
Over/Under Goals Rayo Vallecano
Result and Both Teams to Score 6 Way
Over/Under Total Corners
Over/Under Total Corners Rayo Vallecano
Over/Under Total Cards
Over/Under Total Cards Rayo Vallecano